Click here to read official statements »
“Peace Corps has suspended its volunteer activities in Kazakhstan based on a number of operational considerations. All 117 Peace Corps volunteers serving in the country are safe and accounted for, and will soon be participating in a transition conference.”
(Official Statement Source)
“The Peace Corps decided to suspend its program in Kazakhstan due to a unique and unfortunate combination of ongoing safety, operational, programming and Volunteer support concerns. …This serious decision was made largely because of growing safety issues, including terrorism and the fact that Kazakhstan has apparently become the highest sexual assault/rape level among Peace Corps countries worldwide.”
Peace Corps Kazakhstan Headquarters asked volunteers to: “Please refrain from sharing information about the Volunteer departure with the media or posting information on Facebook or other social media sites until all volunteers have safely arrived at the conference location.”
With so much attention, debate, and chatter occurring, I felt it necessary to make a statement: firstly, I don’t want to leave, we don’t want to leave, our students don’t want us to leave, our schools and orgs don’t want us to leave, our friends and families don’t want us to leave. We are not quitting, we are being forced to leave involuntarily and against our will. Secondly, I want to address these “safety issues”. It’s a fact: Kazakhstan has the highest sexual assault/rape level among Peace countries worldwide. I don’t dispute that and this isn’t something to gloss over. However this isn’t enough to close an 18-year-old program that has served an immeasurable amount of people.
I am disputing the claims about the “ongoing safety concerns, and here’s the main reason why: during the 2010 Kyrgyzstani riots in the Kyrgyz Republic (Kazakhstan’s southern neighbor) there was genocide occurring in southern Kyrgyzstan. Genocide. interethnic violence in Southern Kyrgyzstan. And yet Peace Corps has remained in Kyrgyzstan, though this choice to remain open was a complicated one. Here are three comments from PCVs in Kyrgyzstan who served during that time:
“I was a PCV in Osh of Kyrgyzstan during the ethnic clashes and riots and it seemed that they were never even considering closing the program because safety concerns. It’s interesting to me how fast [Peace Corps' withdrawal from Kazakhstan] was resolved.” (Source)
“The genocide in southern Kyrgyzstan was Kyrgyz killing Uzbeks. It was isolated to the south though. We were getting consolidated (stage #3 of Peace Corps’ five-stage emergency system) almost every two months and I was on standfast (stage #2) most of my service due to all the political and ethnic issues in the country.”
“I was one of the dozen or so PCVs evacuated from Southern Kyrgyzstan due to the conflict that took place in summer 2010. Please do not give the impression to others that the choice for Peace Corps to remain open in Kyrgyzstan was an uncomplicated one. Of course safety issues and the idea of closing down the program was talked about (The south of Kyrgyzstan, roughly half the size of the whole program, was shut down. Geographical and other barriers between the north and south of Kyrgyzstan made this a plausible solution.). Also, you may wish to reconsider your use of the term Genocide. Most of the elements of genocide do not fit what actually happened in Kyrgyzstan; this is not such an easily defined conflict. Genocide was a term used at the beginning of the conflict before much was known about how complicated and multifaceted it was; many do not consider this term appropriate to describe the conflict now.”
Are we supposed to believe that four unrelated attacks in different parts of the country are reason to pull out every volunteer and close Peace Corps? The four attacks are as follows: in May a suicide bomber in Aktobe, in June a vehicle explosion in Astana, in October bombings in Atyrau, and most recently in November attacks in Taraz resulting in eight deaths, for a grand total of 12 people – most of which were the suicide bombers themselves. To put this in geographic perspective, that would be four unrelated attacks in Denver, Albuquerque, New Orleans, and St. Louis. Troubling and concerning, but this doesn’t compare to Kyrgyzstan, where volunteers were shot at and had their buildings burned. What does this say to me?
Influential members of the Kazakhstani government A)find Peace Corps’ programs and volunteer’s work irrelevant and unnecessary due to level of development that can be found B)don’t trust us, dislike us, and want us gone or C) both.
Take note Moms & Worryworts: we volunteers are safe, we are accounted for, our security is not under threat. We will be home soon without incident, and until then you couldn’t ask for more hospitable, kind, loving, generous, truly wonderful people to be getting your loved ones there.
Since being told of our abrupt suspension and withdrawal, I wanted to write on this blog about what’s going on from the perspective of someone living over here. However, my amazing friend Becca wrote “A Eulogy to Peace Corps Kazakhstan” and this will be this most in-depth, accurate article you will find about the current conditions in Kazakhstan and Peace Corps.